Hope vs. Defiance: A Comparative Corpus Analysis of Emotional Lexis in MLK’s I Have a Dream and Churchill’s We Shall Fight on the Beaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71146/kjmr789Keywords:
Political Discourse, Corpus Analysis, Martin Luthar King (MLK), Winston ChurchillAbstract
Political speeches function not only as instruments of persuasion but also as powerful emotional artifacts that mobilize collective consciousness during moments of crisis and transformation. This study undertakes a comparative corpus-based analysis of emotional lexis in two iconic political speeches: Martin Luther King’s The American Dream and Winston Churchill’s We Shall Fight on the Beaches. Drawing on corpus linguistics and emotion-oriented discourse analysis, the research investigates how hope and defiance are linguistically constructed, foregrounded, and strategically deployed in American civil rights rhetoric and British wartime discourse respectively. Using a small, specialized corpus, the analysis employs Voyant Tools, AntConc, and Text Inspector to examine lexical frequency, keyword salience, collocation patterns, sentiment polarity, semantic fields, and evaluative language. The findings are expected to reveal significant contrasts in emotional framing: King’s discourse privileging optimism, moral aspiration, and collective uplift, while Churchill’s rhetoric emphasizes resistance, resolve, and national endurance. By integrating quantitative corpus techniques with qualitative interpretation, the study demonstrates how emotional lexis operates as an ideological and rhetorical resource in political leadership across cultures. The research contributes to corpus-assisted political discourse analysis, offering insights into the emotional mechanics of persuasion in canonical political texts
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Azmat Batool, Dr. M. Faisal Hanif, Mussarat Qamar, Faiza Altaf (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (KJMR) distributes all published articles under an open access license to ensure wide dissemination and reuse of scholarly work.
Unless otherwise stated, articles published in KJMR are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license:
-
Permissions Granted
Readers and users are free to:-
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
-
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
-
-
Conditions of Use
-
Appropriate credit must be given to the original author(s), the article title, and the Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research.
-
A link to the license must be provided.
-
Any changes made to the original work must be clearly indicated.
-
The use must not imply endorsement by the author(s) or the journal.
-
-
Author Rights
-
Authors retain full copyright of their work.
-
Authors grant KJMR the non-exclusive right to publish, archive, and distribute the article in electronic and print forms.
-
Authors are permitted to deposit the final published version of their article in institutional or subject repositories without embargo.
-
-
Third-Party Material
-
Any third-party content included in an article must be clearly credited and may be subject to separate licensing terms.
-
It is the responsibility of the author(s) to obtain necessary permissions for such material.
-
-
Long-Term Accessibility
-
KJMR ensures permanent availability of published content through its official website and archiving partners, supporting long-term scholarly access.
-
These distribution license terms align with international open access standards and support the journal’s mission to promote ethical, transparent, and wide dissemination of multidisciplinary research.
How to Cite
