IMPACT OF MOTT GRASS ON LIVESTOCK NUTRITION, FARM ECONOMICS AND HOUSEHOLD RESILIENCE IN DISTRICT KHYBER, PAKISTAN

Authors

  • Abid Muhammad Shah Agriculture Extension Department Merged Districts, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Peshawar, Pakistan. Author
  • Maryam Samad NIDA Pakistan, University Town, Peshawar, Pakistan. Author
  • Shehzad Elahi NIDA Pakistan, University Town, Peshawar, Pakistan. Author
  • Zia Ul Islam Agriculture Extension Department, District Khyber (Merged Districts), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Peshawar, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71146/kjmr939

Keywords:

Adoption, Fodder security, Household resilience, Livestock productivity, Mott grass, Napier hybrid

Abstract

Livestock production in Pakistan is constrained by chronic fodder shortages, poor quality feed resources and rising feeding costs, especially in smallholder mixed farming systems. To address these challenges, a community-based intervention introducing Mott grass (Napier hybrid) was implemented in District Khyber, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of Mott grass cultivation on fodder availability, livestock productivity, economic returns and household resilience. A quantitative method was adopted involving structured questionnaires and field observations with 50 beneficiary households selected through Community Based Organizations. Results indicated a high establishment success rate, with 92% of farmers successfully cultivating Mott grass and 88% fully adopting it within their livestock systems. Post intervention findings showed a substantial improvement in fodder availability, with 86% of farmers reporting adequate supply compared to 22% before the intervention. Improvements were also observed in livestock performance, as 82% of farmers reported better body condition and 76% observed increased milk yield. Economic analysis revealed a significant reduction in feeding costs, with 68% of farmers reporting decreased expenditures and 66% showing reduced dependency on purchased feed. Furthermore, 78% of respondents reported improved farm profitability. Farmer perceptions were overwhelmingly positive, with 72% expressing high satisfaction and 92% recommending future scale up of the intervention. Moreover, 84% of households reported improved resilience during fodder scarce periods. The study demonstrates that Mott grass is a highly effective perennial fodder option for improving livestock nutrition and reducing economic stress in smallholder systems. The findings conclude that integrating Mott grass into livestock production systems can significantly enhance fodder security, improve productivity and strengthen household resilience under resource limited and climate vulnerable conditions in Pakistan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AARI (Ayub Agricultural Research Institute). (2022). Fodder research and Napier grass promotion reports. Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Afzal, M., & Naqvi, A. N. (2004). Livestock resources of Pakistan: Present status and future trends. Quarterly Science Vision, 9(1–2), 1–13.

Anwar, M., Khan, S., & Ali, F. (2021). Forage production potential of Napier grass under different management practices. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 58(3), 1123–1131.

Ashraf, M., Ahmad, K., & Ali, A. (2020). Farmer perceptions and adoption of improved fodder technologies in mixed farming systems of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 57(4), 1021–1030.

Ayele, S., Duncan, A., Larbi, A., & Khanh, T. T. (2012). Trends and drivers of livestock production systems in developing countries. Food Security, 4(3), 371–388.

Chaudhry, A. S., Shaheen, S., & Khan, F. (2022). Ethnobotanical importance of fodder grasses in Punjab and their role in livestock feeding systems. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 13, 56.

Cook, B. G., Pengelly, B. C., Brown, S. D., et al. (2005). Tropical forages: An overview of forage production and animal nutrition. CSIRO.

Devendra, C., & Thomas, D. (2002). Crop–animal interactions in mixed farming systems. Agricultural Systems, 71(1–2), 27–40.

FAO. (2014). The state of food and agriculture: Innovation in family farming. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

FAO. (2019). Livestock and climate change: Sustainable livestock development. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Habte, E., Beyene, S., & Kebede, T. (2020). Evaluation of Napier grass for biomass yield and forage quality under different agro ecological conditions. Tropical Grasslands–Forrajes Tropicales, 8(3), 210–218.

Harun, N., Chaudhry, A. S., Shaheen, S., et al. (2017). Fodder grass utilization and livestock feeding practices in Central Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 13, 56.

Hassan, M. U., Iqbal, M. A., & Saeed, Q. (2020). Impact of fodder development interventions on livestock productivity in smallholder systems. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 32(5), 1–10.

Hazell, P., Poulton, C., Wiggins, S., & Dorward, A. (2010). The future of small farms for poverty reduction and growth (IFPRI Discussion Paper 01027). IFPRI.

Hussain, M., Khan, N., & Rehman, A. (2022). Adoption behavior of improved forage crops in rainfed areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 38(2), 345–356.

Iqbal, A., Khan, B. B., Tariq, M., & Mirza, M. A. (2009). Effect of different feeding strategies on milk production performance of dairy animals in Pakistan. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 29(2), 81–84.

Iqbal, Z., Abbas, A., & Ahmad, K. (2018). Role of extension services in adoption of improved fodder technologies in mixed farming systems. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 22(2), 45–56.

Iqbal, Z., Abbas, A., & Ahmad, K. (2019). Role of extension services in livestock fodder development in Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 27(1), 55–66.

Jalal, F., Arif, M., Akbar, H., & Khan, M. A. (2012). Yield and quality performance of different fodder crops under irrigated conditions. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 28(4), 621–626.

Khan, N., Rehman, A., & Shah, S. (2019). Adaptability of perennial fodder grasses under arid and semi arid conditions. Journal of Range Management, 71(4), 355–362.

Methu, J. N., Gachuiri, C. K., & Mureithi, J. G. (2013). Performance of Napier grass varieties under different management systems in smallholder dairy farms. Tropical Grasslands–Forrajes Tropicales, 1(1), 1–8.

Pakistan Agricultural Research Council. (2021). Livestock and fodder development reports. Islamabad, Pakistan.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Sarwar, M., Khan, M. A., & Iqbal, Z. (2002). Feed resources for livestock in Pakistan. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 4(1), 186–192.

Shakil, Q., Kanwal, A., Iqbal, J., et al. (2023). AARI Napier grass as a sustainable fodder strategy for Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Research, 61(2), 300–315.

Thornton, P. K., & Herrero, M. (2015). Adapting crop–livestock systems in developing countries. Global Food Security, 4, 28–34.

Umair, A., Rahim, M., Ahmed, S., et al. (2022). Performance of grasses for biomass and fodder production under rainfed conditions in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 65(3), 250–260.

World Bank. (2021). Future of food: Harnessing digital technologies to improve food system outcomes. World Bank Group.

Wossen, T., Abdoulaye, T., Alene, A., Feleke, S., Manyong, V., & Maredia, M. (2017). Impact of information access on smallholder farmer technology adoption: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(3), 783–802.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

Categories

How to Cite

IMPACT OF MOTT GRASS ON LIVESTOCK NUTRITION, FARM ECONOMICS AND HOUSEHOLD RESILIENCE IN DISTRICT KHYBER, PAKISTAN. (2026). Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(05), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.71146/kjmr939